In California, criminal cases include a preliminary hearing in which the government puts on evidence to show that there is reason to go to trial on the charges brought against a defendant or defendants. The great majority of these “Prelim Hearings” find in favor or the prosecution.
This afternoon in a courtroom in Placerville, CA, a Superior Court Judge bucked the odds. David and Shane Travis Smith were charged with recklessly starting the Caldor Fire on August 14, 2021. That fire burned over 200,000 acres, injured at least 20 people and burned a large number of structures and wiped out the town of Grizzly Flats. After four days of testimony, the judge found that the prosecution failed to provide sufficient evidence that the Smiths started the fire and dismissed the charges.
I worked as the investigator for Travis Smith’s attorney, Mark Reichel. David Smith was represented by the irrepressible, Linda Parisi. Along with Reichel’s legal assistant, Doug Stein, we shared a great sense of relief and accomplishment with the Smiths.
David Smith and his son Shane were the first to see the fire and report it to officials. In turn, they were accused of starting the fire by firing some unknown firearm in the area. They theory was that they fired a bullet fired from the an unknown gun. The bullet hit an unspecified rock, sparked and /or splintered and started the blaze.
The theory was initiated by Fire Chief Mark Matthews of the local Pioneer Fire Protection District. If you believe the District Attorney, the US Forest Service and Cal Fire, Matthews was the first to reach the fire at about 10:30 that night (approximately 4 hours after it was first seen by the Smiths.) The general origin area is in a canyon, near a swimming hole, along a river with a northern aspect. The area is also a shooting gallery for anyone with a gun and a six pack of beer or drugs. The ground in the area is always littered with casings from all kinds of weapons.
Matthews would tell fire investigators that when he got to the scene, in the dark, while the fire was growing, he randomly picked up a casing and could smell fresh gunpowder. He therefore surmised it to be the cause of the fire. From that point forward the Smiths were on the hook, despite the fact that Matthews had been the subject of arson investigations in Arizona and Oregon and had been pulled off working the Carr fire in 2018 for possibly starting an unauthorized backfire. (Reports of this came out of Arizona from firefighters assisting CA during the Carr fire and from a Calfire investigator who testified during the Prelim.)
The prosecution’s expert fire causation investigator (I will omit his name as a courtesy.) relied on a 2013 study that concluded that is might be possible for a bullet striking a hard object might cause a fire. The study was conducted in a laboratory setting in which the ambient temperature was 109 degrees, the humidity was 7% and the fuel for any sparks or hot bullet fragments to ignite was Russian Peat Moss preheated to 131 degrees. The peat moss was located inches away from steel plate that bullets were fired against.
At best, the experiment created smoldering and the results concluded that in the rare case that smoldering might start, it could take anywhere from hours to days to ignite into a flame.
The USFS fire investigator used data from a weather station located some 2 and 1/2 miles away in a hilltop that has full sun exposure throughout the day. Even so the reading at the time showed an ambient temperature of 87 degrees (31 degrees cooler that the temperature in the laboratory.), a fuel temperature of 85 degrees (46 degrees cooler that the moss used as fuel in the lab setting.) and the relative humidity was 28% (Four times greater that the relative humidity in the lab.
Add to the differences in the conditions at the weather station versus the lab conditions, the fact that the general area of origin of the fire was a northern aspect and near water, the ambient temperature would have been cooler, the fuel temperature would have been cooler and more moist and the relative humidity would have been even higher. Despite knowing this, the USFS felt no need to to conduct tests to see if it was possibly to even create smoldering from a ammunition fired not into a steel plate, but rather rocks that were present at the scene.
In addition two prospectors camping just over the ridge from the general origin area, said that the Smith’s warned them of the fire as they traveled out of the canyon to get cell coverage. One prospector said that he had only heard gunshots in the area where the fire when our clients were there. The other said he heard shots earlier that morning, the night before and the afternoon before. In a tape recorded interview (one that was withheld by the USFS until last week.) this miner said that he had been working that claim for over 50 years and people shot in the area where the fire started all the time.
GPS data retrieved from the Smith ATV and tesitimony of the miners put the Smiths in the general area of origin for no more than 20 minutes. Not nearly enough time to shoot, create a spark or fragment, cause smoldering and have the smoldering turn into flames that the Smiths eventually saw and could not extinguish.
As a result, the judge found that the prosecution could not say with certainty that a gun shot could have started a fire under the circumstances that existed at the time, let alone that our clients fired shots that could have cause the fire.